Now my figures are taken to mean 'The armour at it's thickest' - which would be the path of a shot through the hull glacis sloped at circa 30 degrees or through the turret mantle. However, you can be assured that the disparity would be even greater. I'm having to compare them to Second World War tanks, because modern tanks far outclass them in terms of effective armour and speed, but due to still being in service, little information is available regarding their armour. My comparisons are made for the Leman Russ, which is the standard battle tank of the IG and the Baneblade - essentially the heavy tank to end all heavy tanks. However, if I my job description entailed sitting down and designing a model that is meant to be believably tank-like, I'd at least take the time to spare even Wikipedia a glance at how tanks are actually, well, designed. Obviously, these models are thought up by miniature sculptors - not weapons designers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |